AI advisory that turns operating problems into interfaces, workflows, and decision tools people can actually use.

Bring me the problem (opens in a new tab)

The work is not buying an AI tool.

You can buy every tool in the store and still not have a house. Someone has to know what is being built, in what order, and which decisions change once it is standing.

The other order is to buy the platform first and ask the operation to adapt around it. Six months on it is configured, and the decision it was bought to improve is still made the same way it was before.

How I break it down

  1. 01

    Name the decision

    Which call actually gets made, how often, and who is on the hook when it goes wrong?

  2. 02

    Map the real inputs

    What does that person genuinely look at before they decide, and what are they guessing at?

  3. 03

    Build the thin version

    What is the smallest thing that changes the call next week rather than next quarter?

  4. 04

    Choose tools last

    Now, what does this need to run on, and does it need anything new at all?

What I look for first

  • The number nobody trusts, so every call gets escalated to whoever remembers the context.
  • The spreadsheet running alongside the system of record, because that is where the real process lives.
  • The handoff where work waits, unowned, because it sits between two owners.

Diagnostic

2 to 3 weeks

From $7,500

Frame the decision, map the work around it, and leave with a recommendation you can act on without me.

  • The consequential decision named
  • The current workflow mapped
  • A build recommendation you own
Start with a diagnostic (opens in a new tab)

Build sprint

4 to 6 weeks

From $25,000

We make the thing. A working interface or workflow in front of real users, early enough to still change it.

  • A working artifact, not a prototype deck
  • Weekly working sessions
  • The data and systems it needs to run
Scope a build sprint (opens in a new tab)

Standing advisory

Ongoing

From $9,000 a month

Operator judgment while the capability lands, gets adopted, and improves after the launch noise stops.

  • Direct access, no account layer
  • Review of what shipped and what it changed
  • Roadmap pressure-testing
Talk about advisory (opens in a new tab)

About these numbers

They are starting points, not quotes. What moves them is scope: how many systems the work has to touch, how much of the data already exists, and how quickly it has to be in front of real people. The first call is thirty minutes and ends with a straight answer about which shape fits, including when the answer is none of them.

Bring the problem nobody has made tangible yet.

You do not need a perfect brief. Start with the stubborn workflow, the missed signal, or the decision your team should be able to make better.

Both reach me directly. Writing is usually faster if you are outside US Central time, and it means I have read the problem before we speak.